2005 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW M3 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M3 | EJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3244 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 337 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |
