2005 BMW M3 vs. 1973 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW M3 | 1973 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | 160 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3244 cc | 1638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 337 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |