2005 BMW M3 vs. 1983 Holden Camira

To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications: