2005 BMW M3 vs. 1994 Volvo 850

To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1994 Volvo 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volvo 850. (170 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volvo 850.

Compare all specifications: