2005 BMW M3 vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 BMW M3.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW M3. (337 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW M3 | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | BMW | GMC |
| Model | M3 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3244 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 337 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3030 mm |
