2005 BMW M3 vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2005 BMW M3. (323 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (372 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW M3 | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 372 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |