2005 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (323 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Because 2005 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (372 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW M3 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | M3 | Megane |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |