2005 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW M3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2005 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW M3 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | M3 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 337 Nm | 155 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |