2005 BMW X3 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2005 BMW X3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X3 (184 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X3 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X3 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | X3 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 75 L |
