2005 BMW X3 vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2005 BMW X3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2005 BMW X3. (184 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 327 kg more than 2005 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X3 | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X3 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2050 mm |
