2005 BMW X3 vs. 1982 Bristol Brigand
To start off, 2005 BMW X3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X3 weights approximately 57 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2005 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X3 | 1982 Bristol Brigand | |
| Make | BMW | Bristol |
| Model | X3 | Brigand |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5898 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1758 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 82 L |
