2005 BMW X3 vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2005 BMW X3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2005 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW X3. (237 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW X3 | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | X3 | XU 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |