2005 BMW X3 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW X3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2005 BMW X3. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW X3.
Because 2005 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW X3. (300 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X3 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | X3 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
