2005 BMW X5 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X5 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 79 L |
