2005 BMW X5 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X5 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 79 L |
