2005 BMW X5 vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 1610 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW X5 | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | X5 | 2CV |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 63 L |