2005 BMW X5 vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X5 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 82 L |
