2005 BMW X5 vs. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | X5 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 107 L |
