2005 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Bristol Brigand
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 412 kg more than 1982 Bristol Brigand.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bristol Brigand has automatic transmission and 2005 BMW X5 has manual transmission. 2005 BMW X5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bristol Brigand will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW X5 | 1982 Bristol Brigand | |
Make | BMW | Bristol |
Model | X5 | Brigand |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 1758 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 82 L |