2005 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW X5 | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2580 mm |