2005 BMW X5 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | BMW | Caterham |
| Model | X5 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 36 L |
