2005 BMW X5 vs. 1999 Ford O21 C

To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford O21 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford O21 C would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1999 Ford O21 C. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford O21 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 872 kg more than 1999 Ford O21 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford O21 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW X5 (520 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford O21 C. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford O21 C. 1999 Ford O21 C has automatic transmission and 2005 BMW X5 has manual transmission. 2005 BMW X5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford O21 C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 BMW X5 1999 Ford O21 C
Make BMW Ford
Model X5 O21 C
Year Released 2005 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2926 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 215 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 520 Nm 178 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 81.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2170 kg 1298 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 3610 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1720 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 93 L 132 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]