2005 BMW X5 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2005 BMW X5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW X5 (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW X5 weights approximately 904 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW X5 (520 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2005 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2005 BMW X5 has manual transmission. 2005 BMW X5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | X5 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 520 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2830 mm |
