2005 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW X5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 370 kg more than 2005 BMW X5.
Because 2005 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW X5 | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | BMW | Fisker |
| Model | X5 | Karma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 36 L |
