2005 BMW Z4 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2005 BMW Z4. (141 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2005 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW Z4. (200 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW Z4. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2005 BMW Z4 has manual transmission. 2005 BMW Z4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW Z4 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z4 | SRX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 2480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |