2005 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1997 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 2005 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 175 kg more than 2005 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2005 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Blenheim | 1997 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Blenheim | Concorde |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2880 mm |