2005 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2005 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 420 more horse power than 2005 Bristol Blenheim. (350 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Bristol Blenheim. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 553 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Bristol Blenheim. (500 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Bristol Blenheim.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | Blenheim | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5897 cc | 9371 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 770 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 926 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2570 mm |
