2005 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 5,897 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 216 kg more than 2005 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2005 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Bristol | GMC |
| Model | Blenheim | Safari |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5897 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1956 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
