2005 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2002 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2005 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Vision weights approximately 175 kg more than 2005 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2005 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Blenheim | 2002 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Bristol | Eagle |
Model | Blenheim | Vision |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |