2005 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2012 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XK weights approximately 385 kg more than 2005 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Blenheim | 2012 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | Blenheim | XK |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1328 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 61 L |