2005 Bristol Fighter vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2005 Bristol Fighter is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 7,992 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 435 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 895 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Fighter | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Bristol | Lotus |
Model | Fighter | Elite |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7992 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 29 L |