2005 Bristol Fighter vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Bristol Fighter is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 7,992 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 418 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Fighter | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Bristol | Plymouth |
Model | Fighter | Valiant |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7992 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |