2005 Bristol Fighter vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Bristol Fighter is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 7,992 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 435 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 230 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 579 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bristol Fighter | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Bristol | Triumph |
| Model | Fighter | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7992 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 714 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
