2005 Bristol Fighter vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Bristol Fighter is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,992 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 539 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Mustang. (678 Nm). This means 2005 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Fighter | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Fighter | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7992 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 714 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |