2005 Bristol Fighter vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Bristol Fighter is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 7,992 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 325 kg more than 2005 Bristol Fighter.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bristol Fighter | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | Fighter | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7992 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 714 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 78 L |
