2005 Bristol Fighter vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Bristol Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Bristol Fighter would be higher. At 7,992 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bristol Fighter (518 HP) has 375 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2005 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bristol Fighter | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Fighter | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7992 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |