2005 Bugatti Chiron vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 521 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 597 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bugatti Chiron | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Bugatti | DAF |
| Model | Chiron | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 6255 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 547 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 65 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1380 mm |
