2005 Bugatti Chiron vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 379 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Commodore. (352 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bugatti Chiron | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Bugatti | Holden |
| Model | Chiron | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 6255 cc | 5042 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 547 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1380 mm |
