2005 Bugatti Chiron vs. 1982 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 422 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (296 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bugatti Chiron | 1982 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Bugatti | Ford |
| Model | Chiron | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 6255 cc | 4093 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 547 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1400 mm |
