2005 Bugatti Chiron vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Bugatti Chiron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Bugatti Chiron would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP) has 307 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bugatti Chiron | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Bugatti | Holden |
Model | Chiron | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 6255 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | V |
Horse Power | 547 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 650 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |