2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL vs. 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX
To start off, both 2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL and 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL and 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX are equipped with a 3,786 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX (201 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX should accelerate faster than 2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL weights approximately 3 kg more than 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 312 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LaCrosse CXL | 2005 Buick LaCrosse CX | |
| Make | Buick | Buick |
| Model | LaCrosse | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |
