2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (241 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 1003 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (305 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1960 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Buick | Mini |
| Model | LaCrosse | MK I |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 241 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2040 mm |
