2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1964 Citroen DS
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (200 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 308 kg more than 1964 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1964 Citroen DS | |
Make | Buick | Citroen |
Model | LaCrosse | DS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 82 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |