2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (200 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 418 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | LaCrosse | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |