2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1965 Buick Electra
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 445 kg more than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1965 Buick Electra | |
| Make | Buick | Buick |
| Model | LaCrosse | Electra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 6570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 95 L |
