2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (241 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 958 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Buick | DAF |
Model | LaCrosse | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 241 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 33 L |