2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 670 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Buick LaCrosse | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Buick | Riley |
| Model | LaCrosse | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |
