2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 63 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | LaCrosse | E-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |