2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (200 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 166 kg more than 2005 Buick LaCrosse.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | LaCrosse | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1621 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 53 L |