2005 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 130 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Buick LaCrosse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Buick LaCrosse | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Buick | Mini |
Model | LaCrosse | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |